
"The Chronicles of Riddick" is the sequel to the 1999 sleeper "Pitch Black," which was a smart and suspenseful sci-fi/horror film set on a single planet with three suns that eclipse once every 21 years. "Pitch Black" focused strongly on deep, interesting characters and an intelligent plot, and the moral of the film was that anyone, no matter how horrible a person they may be, can find the potential for change for the better within themselves.
"The Chronicles of Riddick" is neither smart nor suspenseful, lacks both deep, interesting characters and an intelligent plot, and teaches us that answering every question with a question followed by a cliché wannabe badass remark is a very asinine and annoying habit. Oh, and that in the future, spending five years in the "slam" will turn an awkward teenager from the first film into a very attractive young woman. Right.
Someone might say I had my expectations too high for "The Chronicles of Riddick," that I should enjoy the movie for what it is, blah blah blah, or how could you like "Van Helsing" and not this film? I say I enjoyed "Van Helsing" because my expectations were set by the trailers going in: badass monster hunter kicks monster's asses in a string of high action effects sequences, minimal character development, and that's what I got. "Pitch Black" set my expectations for "The Chronicles of Riddick" by being a very smart and sexy sci-fi thriller with real chracters who had real problems. If you can ignore that the first movie exists, then "The Chronicles of Riddick" serves at best as a substandard big-budget mediocre science fiction space opera, a "xXx" of sci-fi films with big stylish fight scenes, big special effects, and really not much else going for it.
Comments and feedback, as always, is welcome.
Hey, why not subscribe to the GadgetMadness News Feed?
Why Subscribe?
know why (via email or RSS)!

Is it better or worse than Wing Commander?
Budget and production value is better on Riddick so it's better, but only in those aspects. Many of the lines and scenes in Riddick are as cheesy as those find in Wing Commander. Plus the editing in Riddick was weird. For example one second he's in a Necromonger ship, the next he's back down on the planet being chased by mercs. How'd he get down so far so fast? How'd he get out of the ship? "These are the things I need to know."
An appropriate comparison just hit me this morning. Highlander is to Highlander 2 as Pitch Black is to The Chronicles of Riddick.
I think that would work with most sequels.
Examples:
Caddyshack vs. Caddyshack 2
The Crow vs. The Crow: City of Angels
Die Hard vs. Die Harder vs. Die Hardest
Breakin' vs. Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo
Nunsense vs. Nunsense 2: The Sequel
All classics that were ruined by their successors.
Well, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. He was right about the bad guys being a bit too "fake" compared to those in other films. I've gotta disagree about Vin Diesel's portrayal of Riddick. I think he did an excellent job.
BTW, he said "29.4 Kilometers" to let everyone know how far the journey is from Crematoria to the flight landing dock. It was one of those "detail" things you had mentioned weren't in this film.
However, I did like Pitch Black much better than Chronicles of Riddick.
Comments are self-approved by the poster via email verification. We won't use your email address for any other purpose, promise.
SUBSCRIBE TO GADGETMADNESS
Return to the home page for more articles...